Good morning. I'm delighted to be here. Thank you, Eric, for inviting me to join you at the firm's international symposium. It is particularly gratifying to me to meet with you in my country. I hope you have a wonderful stay in Buenos Aires.

You have asked me to talk about IFAC's mission and how it affects global audit networks. I will gladly do that and then take your questions.

IFAC has a history of collaboration with the international networks firms such as PKF.

I want to thank PKF partners and associates for their support of IFAC's work. I would also like to personally extend a word of thanks to Theo Vermaak, PKF's representative on IFAC's Transnational Auditors Committee (TAC), for bringing his valuable practical experience to that committee. The TAC is an IFAC committee, but at the same time is the executive arm of the Forum of Firms.

As you probably know, PKF together with 22 other accounting networks involved in multinational audits, participate in IFAC chiefly through the Forum of Firms. The Forum was established six years ago to address criticisms and concerns expressed by international stakeholders with regard to the use of international standards and consistent audit performance among international auditing network firms.

Upon joining the Forum, the networks made a major commitment to IFAC standards and other quality measures.

Good afternoon ladies and gentlemen.

Before I start I would just like to say what a privilege and a pleasure it is for me to be able to participate on this panel. I wish to focus my comments on the work of the IFAC Small and Medium Practices (SMP) Committee that I chair in helping meet the needs of SMPs in this region.

Let me first articulate what my committee suspects are the main issues confronting SMPs in Latin America and the Caribbean.

First, the issue of the relevance of international standards of accounting, assurance, education and ethics to SME/SMP. Some believe these standards are written primarily with large entities in mind resulting in over-regulation of SME/SMP. For example, we fear new auditing standards may undermine the viability of SME audits and SMPs.

Secondly there is the issue of the capacity of SMP/SME to efficiently implement, and comply with, these standards. Small practitioners lack specialist in-house resources and suffer from professional isolation.

Thirdly SMPs are faced with acute problems - increasing competitive pressures, a decreasing amount of staple regulatory work, and operational problems such as staff recruitment and retention and effective networking.

Good morning ladies and gentlemen. Thank you for participating today in this regional conference for the Caribbean and Latin America on accounting and accountability for regional economic growth.

Together with the World Bank and the Inter-American Development Bank, it is our intention that this conference provide us the opportunity to identify the principal challenges and questions that the region needs to address and, above all, to permit us to identify concrete solutions and, in some cases, to consider collaborative projects that make these solutions viable or more efficient. ** Note: Attached below are the English and Spanish versions of this speech.

At its meeting last week in New York City, the Board of the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) agreed to assist the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) in obtaining feedback on its proposed International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) for Small and Medium-sized Entities (SMEs)through field testing and other means. In addition, it agreed to strengthen collaboration with regional accountancy organizations to encourage greater alignment with the IFAC strategy. The Board also discussed the need to more effectively engage various stakeholders in the convergence process, work more closely with the investment community, proactively address small and medium practice (SMP) and SME issues, and communicate more consistent global messages about the value and integrity of the profession. An approach for translating key sections of the IFAC website was also approved. During the meeting, Professor Stavros Thomadakis, Chairman of the Public Interest Oversight Board (PIOB), commented on the PIOB's progress in overseeing IFAC's public interest activities and expressed its satisfaction to date with the cooperation it is receiving from IFAC and its independent boards. A major portion of the meeting was devoted to strategic planning issues. As part of that process, regulatory, standard setting and business leaders provided insights and views to help shape the Board's priorities and future agenda. Guest speakers were:

• Mark Olson, Chairman of the U.S. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB), who highlighted the importance of standards setters, such as the PCAOB and the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board, continuing to closely monitor each other's work and agendas;
• Professor Robert Kaplan of the Harvard Business School and co-author of the Balanced Scorecard, who spoke on the implications of the balanced scorecard for enhanced business reporting; and
• Paul Pacter, IASB Director of Standards for Small and Medium-sized Entities, who outlined the proposed IFRS for SMEs.

Among other matters, Mr. Pacter urged all Board members and regional accountancy organizations to encourage responses from their respective constituencies on the proposed standard and perceived challenges to its adoption. IFAC President Fermín del Valle stated, "IFAC is highly supportive of this project and recognizes the considerable progress made. To ensure that the final standard meets the needs of the SMP/SME marketplace, it is crucial that IFAC and its members help the IASB seek out and capture the views of all relevant constituents, primarily SMEs, SMPs, and users of SME financial statements." The Board meeting followed a meeting with more than 30 chief executives of national accounting organizations in over 25 countries, which was designed to bring those organizations' perspectives to the deliberations of IFAC's planning. IFAC is the worldwide organization for the accountancy profession dedicated to serving the public interest by strengthening the profession and contributing to the development of strong international economies. IFAC is comprised of 155 members and associates in 118 countries, representing more than 2.5 million accountants in public practice, education, government service, industry and commerce. Through its independent standard-setting boards, IFAC sets ethics, auditing and assurance, education, and public sector accounting standards. It also issues guidance to encourage high quality performance by professional accountants in business.

Good morning ladies and gentlemen. Thank you for inviting me to speak before you today on a topic that I think is critical to the well being of Sri Lanka and to other countries both in South Asia and worldwide: that is, the importance of corporate governance in the public sector. It is a topic that is receiving increasing attention from the media, the public and governments themselves, although it has been long been of importance to the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC).

For twenty years, IFAC has been working to improve the financial reporting and financial management of governments at all levels - national, state and provincial, and local - as well as that of other public sector entities worldwide. The fiscal accountability of governments is central to enhancing economic growth and development worldwide - one of IFAC's most important goals. Failing to hold governments to account, can, I believe, compromise and even jeopardize ongoing private sector initiatives to building and maintaining confidence in the financial reporting process, lead to friction within government management, and, in less stable environments, result in significant citizen unrest.

Good afternoon ladies and gentlemen. Thank you for inviting me to speak before you today on a topic that I think is critical to the well being of India and to other countries worldwide: that is government financial reporting. It is a topic that is receiving increasing attention from the media, the public and governments themselves, although it has long been of importance to the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC).

It is an issue of significance at all levels of government, including city government. For twenty years, IFAC has been working to improve the financial reporting and financial management of governments at all levels - national, state and provincial, and local - as well as that of other public sector entities worldwide. The fiscal accountability of governments is central to enhancing economic growth and development - one of IFAC's most important goals. Failure to hold governments accountable, can, I believe, compromise and jeopardize private sector initiatives directed at building and maintaining confidence in the financial reporting process, as well as diminishing confidence in democratic processes.

The objective of this paper is to set out the policy of the IAASB on the question: What modifications may a national standard setter that adopts the International Standards promulgated by the IAASB as its national standards make to the International Standards while still asserting that the resulting national standards conform to the International Standards? 

Good afternoon ladies and gentlemen. My name is Ian Ball, and I am the CEO of IFAC. It is a pleasure to be here today to talk about government financial reporting, a topic that is of great importance to me and one that is certainly receiving attention from the media, the public and governments themselves.

An important objective of the International Ethics Standards Board for Accountants (IESBA), an independent standard-setting board within the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC), is to provide auditors with clear guidance on matters of independence. In keeping with this commitment, the IESBA has revised the Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants by updating the definition of a network firm. Network firms are required to be independent of an audit client of another firm within the network.

"The revised definition focuses on how networks operate and how they present themselves to third parties," states Richard George, IESBA Chair. "The public has a right to expect that when firms are part of a network the independence requirements apply to the other firms within the network. This revision provides clear guidance for firms and contains additional information on the application of the definition."

The revised definition is consistent with the definition in the European Union's Eighth Company Law Directive. It would classify firms as network firms if the firms belong to a larger structure that is aimed at cooperation and is clearly aimed at profit or cost sharing, or shares common ownership, control or management, common quality control policies and procedures, common business strategy, the use of a common brand-name or a significant part of professional resources. The revised definition is effective for assurance reports dated on or after December 31, 2008. The Code of Ethics for Professional Accountants and the revision can be downloaded from the IFAC online bookstore at http://www.ifac.org/store/Category.tmpl?Category=Ethics.

About the IESBA and IFAC

The IESBA develops ethical standards and guidance for use by professional accountants. It encourages member bodies to adopt high standards of ethics for their members and promotes good ethical practices globally. The Public Interest Oversight Board oversees the activities of the IESBA and, as one element of that oversight, establishes the criteria for its due process and working procedures.

IFAC is the worldwide organization for the accountancy profession dedicated to serving the public interest by strengthening the profession and contributing to the development of strong international economies. IFAC's current membership consists of approximately 160 professional accountancy bodies in 120 countries, representing more than 2.5 million accountants in public practice, education, government service, industry and commerce. IFAC, through its independent standard-setting boards, sets international standards on ethics, auditing and assurance, education, and public sector accounting. It also issues guidance to encourage high-quality performance by professional accountants in business.

Convergence or equivalence and mutual recognition...? A single set of standards or differential standards for the SMEs...? Although there may be other relevant technical debates, such as the scope and applicability of the use of current market values, these two questions pose possibly the greatest challenges in issuing high-quality international professional standards. These two questions are also interrelated.

The position adopted with respect to SMEs affects the overall process of convergence. Here, I would like to emphasize what I consider a key point: convergence gives standards an authority and credibility that cannot be equaled by any other set of standards, be the issuer a national or regional organization. Even if a globally accepted set of standards does not include the "best possible" standards, assuming it is possible to define and identify the "best possible" standards, if the standards included are high-quality and accepted globally, they will have a force and an authority that would more than compensate for the cost of not adopting "the best". And, most importantly, they would still contribute substantially to enhancing the performance of accountants worldwide.