The IFAC SMP Advisory Group (SMPAG) is pleased to respond to the IESBA Exposure Draft on Proposed Revisions to the Code Relating to the Definition of Engagement Team and Group Audits.
Integrated reporting has been adopted as a market-led initiative by thousands of private and public sector organizations around the world to help them understand and communicate their value creation and performance to investors and other stakeholders.
To enhance trust in integrated corporate reporting, boards need to oversee the integrity of the integrated report and underlying reporting process. To help them, IFAC has worked in partnership with the Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) to develop Executing the Board’s Governance Responsibility for Integrated Reporting—the second installment in IFAC’s integrated reporting assurance series. It highlights how boards execute their accountability responsibility for integrated reporting and integrated reports with the coordination of all lines of governance and the support of internal auditors.
Board responsibility statements incorporate multiple internal assurance activities across all lines of governance and management and support the integrity of the integrated report and the underlying processes, systems, and information. This installment highlights the concepts and tools needed to deliver such statements. These can also be applied to regulated forms of management commentary in many parts of the world, including management discussion and analysis, strategic report, operating and financial review or the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures.
“The IFRS Foundation’s announcement on the future of integrated reporting and the International Integrated Reporting <IR> Framework confirms that the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) and International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) will assume responsibility for the <IR> Framework from July,” said Kevin Dancey, IFAC CEO. “Within the IFRS Foundation, the Framework will be further developed to help companies prepare an integrated report and support connectivity between the reporting required by the IASB and the ISSB. This installment of IFAC’s integrated reporting assurance series shows how directors can deliver confidence in integrated reporting through coordinated and connected internal and external assurance activities.”
“As an integral component of effective organizational governance, internal audit plays a critical role in instilling trust and confidence in the completeness, accuracy, and reliability of the information that forms the basis of the organization’s integrated report,” said Anthony Pugliese, CIA, CPA, CGMA, CITP, president and CEO of The IIA. “As noted in the widely accepted Three Lines Model, internal audit provides objective assurance, independent from management, of internal controls critical to achieving organizational objectives, including objectives related to integrated thinking and reporting.”
About IFAC
IFAC is the global organization for the accountancy profession dedicated to serving the public interest by strengthening the profession and contributing to the development of strong international economies. IFAC is comprised of 180 members and associates in 135 countries and jurisdictions, representing more than 3 million accountants in public practice, education, government service, industry, and commerce.
About The IIA
Established in 1941, The Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA) is an international professional association with global headquarters in Lake Mary, Florida, USA. The IIA is the internal audit profession's global voice, recognized authority, acknowledged leader, chief advocate, and principal educator. Generally, members work in internal auditing, risk management, governance, internal control, information technology audit, education, and security.
IFAC releases second installment of integrated reporting assurance series
Boards of directors need to oversee multiple internal assurance activities across organizations in discharging their responsibilities for the integrity of integrated reporting.
Together with ICAEW, The International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) today released the latest installment in its Anti-Money Laundering: The Basics educational series: Installment Nine: Tools to Fight Back.
The publication is part of a series helping accountants enhance their understanding of how money laundering works, the risks they face, and what they can do to mitigate these risks and make a positive contribution to the public interest. Installment nine examines the tools professional accountants have at their disposal to address money laundering once it’s suspected.
Anti-Money Laundering: The Basics is user-friendly, easily accessible, and will be a resource for small and medium practices (SMPs) and accountants less familiar with AML, while also providing guidance for those looking for a quick refresher or reference.
Anti-Money Laundering: The Basics is featured on both the IFAC (link) and ICAEW websites and available for download for free. To be globally relevant, the series uses the risk-based approach of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) – the global money laundering and terrorist financing watchdog -- as a starting point.
For more information about IFAC, visit www.ifac.org.
This is the ninth installment in the Anti-Money Laundering, The Basics series.
The series provides professional accountants with a better understanding of how money laundering works, the risks they face, and what they can do to mitigate these risks and make a positive contribution to the public interest.
IFAC and ClimatePartner have measured the Corporate Carbon Footprint for IFAC. This measurement was based on the guidelines of the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (GHG Protocol). This report covers the period from December 2019 to December 2020.
IFAC and ClimatePartner have measured the Corporate Carbon Footprint for IFAC. This measurement was based on the guidelines of the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (GHG Protocol). This report covers the period from January 2019 to December 2019.
IFAC and ClimatePartner have measured the Corporate Carbon Footprint for IFAC. This measurement was based on the guidelines of the Greenhouse Gas Protocol Corporate Accounting and Reporting Standard (GHG Protocol). This report covers the period from January 2021 to December 2021.
To answer questions about the cost of audit and how it compares to the fees companies pay for other professional services provided by statutory auditors, the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC) today published Audit Fees Survey 2022: Understanding Audit and Non-Audit Service Fees, 2013-2020. The new study details information about audit-related, tax-related, and other non-audit professional services in the US, Canadian, and European markets across mega-cap, large-cap, mid-cap, small-cap, and micro-cap exchange-listed companies in nine industries.
“The data clearly shows differences across jurisdictions and industries, while demonstrating that fees for non-audit services appear to be on a flat or declining trend,” said IFAC CEO Kevin Dancey. “As audit quality and reform continue to be a focus for the global accountancy profession, this data provides necessary transparency and fosters understanding about the quality, cost and value of the professional services that public practice firms provide to their clients.”
About IFAC IFAC is the global organization for the accountancy profession dedicated to serving the public interest by strengthening the profession and contributing to the development of strong international economies. IFAC is comprised of 180 members and associates in 135 countries and jurisdictions, representing more than 3 million accountants in public practice, education, government service, industry, and commerce.
Data will inform evidence-based discussions on audit costs and their function as value-added services
Understanding Audit Fees and Non-Audit Service Fees, 2013-2020
How much does audit cost? How does this compare to the fees companies pay for other professional services provided by statutory auditors? These questions are the starting point for this report. But when talking about listed companies in different jurisdictions and of all sizes, absolute figures may not shed meaningful comparative insight.
